The Conscience
You reason from character, and you ask what the decision makes of you.
You reached for character more often than for duty or for outcomes. Not the rule and not the arithmetic, but what the decision makes of the person or the institution making it.
Character-led reasoning is the hardest of the three to talk somebody out of, because it is not answering the question the counter-argument is asking: the evidence is about what happens, and your position is about who you are while it happens. That is most of its strength. The thing to watch is that a cost you would not pay yourself still gets paid by somebody, and noticing who is usually what moves a run like this one.
The Conscience
Character & Virtue
Most of your cubes came up amber. The deer is the animal on that band of the printed Moral Compass.
Counted, not named
Whether the twist moved you is no part of this name. A run reports it on its own, as a count of the cases where your side or your reasoning changed, and holding is not better than moving in either direction.
No lens is better than another and neither answer to pressure is better than the other. There is no score here and nothing to be ranked against. A run will tell you how the three profiles fall across everybody who has agreed to leave theirs behind, and where you sit in that, and it stops there: the big share is not the right answer and the small one is not the interesting answer. Every claim it makes about you is printed over the answer that produced it.
Find out how you actually reason.
One case or four, about five minutes each, and a name at the end. No account needed.